Why Gmail is MYmail

I use gmail; it's my main address, and I have reasons for that.

Picture 7.png

History
My first address was in Hotmail, and I liked it, but shortly after I set it up, my workplace gave me my own email address, and I used that, and forgot my Hotmail password, and let the account die.

My work address was good but when I was away from my work computer, I had to use webmail, and I found it awkward, clumsy, and ugly. So I set up a mail account on my ISP. Now when I was away from my home computer, I had to use webmail, with the same complaints, awkward, clumsy and ugly. I did learn how to forward email to another account and that worked well for a while.

I also began to notice certain patterns. If you moved and/or got a new ISP provider, you lost your email address. If professors left the college where I worked, they had their address removed. Not forwarded from, just removed. (The students, there for only a couple of years, and with the same addressing convention as professors, got theirs for life. I never understood why the difference.) I decided I needed a web-based mail application so I could access my email from any online computer, and to protect me, I hoped, from losing an address that I'd been using for a long time. (This was before Facebook.)

At the same time I was using Bloglines to follow a number of bloggers I had found I could learn from. Some made references to Yahoo mail. But I'm very sensitive to the connotations of words, and "[a] Yahoo is a legendary being in the novel Gulliver's Travels (1726) by Jonathan Swift." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yahoo_%28Gulliver%27s_Travels%29 so I just wasn't attracted. And anyway, gmail was recommended  more. Plus, in my mind, "google" was similar to "giggle" and therefore had good connotations, and Google was a known quantity. So I set up a gmail account.

Picture 9.png

What I Like
I have become a real gmail fan. For many reasons, I'm sure I'll miss mentioning some.

The most important!
I forward the three other email addresses I use to my gmail account and, this is the really important part, I can reply from the address the message came in on! So no one knows that I'm not actually on my work account; I'm using gmail.

Picture 10.png

The most trivial
I like visually attractive environments and I like playing and changing. gMail has different themes you can access under Settings on the upper right of the gmail screen.

Conveniencesin no particular order

  • gmail search works well, and even a word in a message gets me to what I'm looking for
    Picture 11.png
  • From my gmail account, I can easily move to other Google sites, the calendar, Google Docs, Reader, and much more
  • I've set up labels (in different colours) and I can drag them onto messages, and use more than one per message (unlike folders) plus I can use a variety of coloured stars to help me organize.
    Picture 12.png
  • I have a huge storage space!
  • I love how I can organize my Contacts, so I have both individual's email and groups' emails available for adding with a click – see the image below for some of my Contacts groups
  • I love GoogleGroups – it's such a useful way for members of a group to communicate with each other – http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Groups

Last (for now)
You can add all kinds of capabilities to suit your needs using Google Labs, the green jug icon.

I've only enabled what I want and that includes the Tasks window on the lower right. As soon as I click on the flat line, it opens and shows my list of tasks.

I was inspired to write this incomplete explanation of why I like gmail so much by http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/7-ways-to-be-more-productive-with-gmail/ You might want to check it out.

 
http://jnthweb.ca/
https://joanvinallcox.wordpress.com/

Posted via email from joanvinallcox’s posterous

I Get HYPER When I’m Not LINKED!

Yesterday Twitter went down. I’d already been bleeding my most boring tweets off by using Backpack’s Journal and fulfilling two purposes:

  1. Re-routing my impulse to tweet about mundane things into, as I mentioned, Backpack’s Journal;
  2. And thus creating a log of my activities, a kind of diary.

Did I mention personal use of Backpack is free? – http://backpackit.com/ And I really appreciate that because I’ve set up the Reminders to send me email when bills are due or automatic withdrawals are scheduled. Thus helping me avoid insufficient funds charges.
So even though I couldn’t access Twitter, I could still type about finishing the newsletter, but in the Backpack Journal, not on the social web. However, I couldn’t harvest and comment on interesting URLs posted by those I follow on Twitter, and I was surprised how much I missed that.

I kept checking Seesmic on the web for Twitter; it’s still down late Friday evening. The Twitter web itself seems intermittent and slow, but I’ve gone back to TweetDeck which seems to be working well and yesterday let me start reading Tweets again and link to the URLs that might be interesting.

What I discovered was kind-of ironic – a blog comparing digital literacy with Networked Literacy – http://www.thethinkingstick.com/digital-literacy-vs-networked-literacy and I was totally struck by it

So I highlighted it using Diigo, – http://www.diigo.com/06sl8 –  bookmarked it, and tweeted it.

Digital literacy is important, but Networking Literacy is essential. I missed Twitter when it was down because it’s my source of interesting, helpful hyperlinks, and where I share the hyperlinks I believe others will benefit from. Even a hint that I could lose this, even only Twitter being down and for just a little while made me realize that

I get hyper when I’m not linked!

http://jnthweb.ca/
https://joanvinallcox.wordpress.com/

Posted via email from joanvinallcox’s posterous

Living in Important Learning Times or The Gatekeepers’ Removal

The Gatekeepers’ Removal
We live in important learning times. Whether that’s a curse or a blessing depends on your point-of-view. I think it’s a blessing for two reasons.

The first time I helped a student correct his error-riddled (green) text on a (dark) computer screen, I knew I would be learning how to use a computer. As a poor and slow typist, I could only get anything I wrote looking like an important document by paying a good typist. Even before the internet, a gatekeeper (the professional typist) stood between me and a polished document. Another and much more restrictive set of gatekeepers stood between me and being published. An agent, an editor, a publisher, and typesetters blocked my writings from being published almost all the time. Gatekeepers had specialized and expensive skills and equipment and I had only ideas that I could rough out (and I do mean rough) by hand.

Early Word Processor

The same kind of situation was true for photographs, audio recordings and film and video. The expense of hiring specialized experts and buying specialized equipment meant that there were very strong gatekeepers limiting people’s ability to practice their creativity fully. Suddenly, with personal computers and software, the expenses were less (a computer and a printer is less expensive than a printing press!) and the different skill sets were reduced and transformed into learning how to use software.

When I saw how easy it was to correct and print what I wrote, I was inspired to learn how to use the computer so I could do graduate studies. I read and wrote and printed up my work, and I’m not sure which was the most important learning, the theory I wrote about, or my learning how to use a word processor. At the same time, the phrase “user-friendly” became central to software development and it became easier and even more fun to create. The gatekeepers were being removed quite quickly.

Word for Windows Manual

So the gatekeepers were being removed ( and there were and are real problems connected with that, but that’s for a different post). But that wasn’t the major change, in my opinion.Living in Important Learning Times
Suddenly (well, in a 20 year time frame) we were all communicating differently. The father of a friend recently told me that when he was in Antarctica 50 years ago, it took eight months to send and receive a return message, by mail, of course. Now he is sending and receiving  messages from all over the world in literally minutes (if the person responding answers right away). And I’m writing and finding illustrations to publish a blog post that anyone in the world who is online can seen almost immediately after I tap on “Send”. Not even time is a gatekeeper anymore.

But the learning I’ve done! the learning we’ve all done!!

I’ve learned how to use various software tools and various web apps. How to make them work technically and how to use them for my own purposes, how to create with them. And all over the world, people are doing the same kind of learning of technical how-to’s and, even more significantly, learning how to connect with the (sometimes very small part of) this huge and hugely diverse audience, how to find their niche, and play in it. We are in a time of great change, and thus great learning. We are all either accepting the learning that faces us, or closing our eyes and denying ourselves. For some of us, this learning, this computer and web stuff comes easily. For some it’s a struggle. I suspect it’s a mixture of ease and struggle for most of us. But it offers us all such opportunities to learn and play and create!

http://jnthweb.ca/
https://joanvinallcox.wordpress.com

Posted via email from joanvinallcox’s posterous

The Web is About Connections

Holiday Monday and I’m playing on the web. I’m scanning through my MakeUseOf.com subscription and decide to look at this – http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/technology-explained-how-the-internet-works/

I read this:

Look at a map of the Internet sometime and you’ll see that it is like a million superhighways with no lines painted on the road. It’s a snake pit of computers attaching to modems attaching to phone lines, or cable, or satellites, or cell networks, attaching to more computers, servers, routers and modems and so on, and so on. There is no beginning. There is no end.

It’s the big picture, and it has a picture

In the image above, you are looking at one very small part of the Internet. See that star-burst like image it is extracted from? Go take a look at the full image.
I take the invitation and find this image

It’s stunningly beautiful, in my opinion, and my mind makes another connection; it’s the macro to a micro image metaphor:

Dandelion fluff, courtesy of Yahoo’s image search,

(I used Yahoo’s controlled image search to find a copyright clean image -filtering for Creative Commons images.)
A quick puff and the dandelion seeds spread out into the world, finding places to link to.

The web is made up of connections, and that’s how our minds work to: the visualization of the web looks like a dandelion, and knowing the global nature of the dandelion, I can grok the global outreaching of web connections.

The web is made up of almost infinite connections, and when I land on one, my mind makes the connections that seed my use of the web’s connections. I link on/with the web.

http://jnthweb.ca/
https://joanvinallcox.wordpress.com

Posted via email from joanvinallcox’s posterous

The Web is a Creativity Generator generating a Culture of Creativity

Photo by Tabea Dibou, from Flickr

We can see more people creating more works than ever before in history. And it’s because of the web and because the web is social. On the web, much is possible. Whether you are finding the right beautiful photo (with the right Creative Commons license) to illustrate metaphorically the connectivity and the beauty of the internet for a blog post, or whether you are playing with a web app (Skitch –  http://skitch.com/) to draw

or to explain something

The web is a space where people want to make, to create. I’m creating this blog post, because it’s FUN! And easy. The phrase “user-friendly” developed with the personal computer. Web apps are aimed at being user-friendly to entice and encourage people to use them, to be creative.The social aspect of the web, the possibility of being seen/heard/recognized, even if only by a very few others, encourages people’s creativity. I might not have composed this blog post if the one I created yesterday hadn’t been re-tweeted, and got  a comment. That thrill of recognition is energizing. So people are playing on computers and posting their creativity on the web. As we get responses ourselves, and even if we just see others get responses, we are encouraged to join in the play. And playfulness spreads.

So serious people who sell cars and race cars become part of the crowd playing:

Two typographers ( Pierre & Damien / plmd.me ) and a pro race pilot (Stef van Campenhoudt) collaborated to design a font with a car.
The car movements were tracked using a custom software, designed by interactive artist Zachary Lieberman. ( openframeworks.cc )
Which I downloaded – nl.toyota.be/iqfont and played with.

Art, play, creativity – that’s how we humans learn and that’s what makes us happy and healthy. And the web is our creativity playground.

Posted via email from joanvinallcox’s posterous

Why I Use More than One Social Bookmarking Service

Not that I’m paranoid (or maybe I am but I like to call it cautious skepticism) but I am always aware than any of the free web services that I use, or even ones I’ve paid for, could go belly up and my stuff on it (them) could vanish into a black hole. So when I read about speculation that my wonderful collection of bookmarks on del.icio.us could disappear, I feel my paranoia is justified.

Internet search marketers could lose some invaluable free tools from Yahoo such as their Site Explorer. Marshall Kirkpatrick at ReadWriteWeb was concerned what the deal meant for Build Your Own Search Service (BOSS), Yahoo’s search developer platform Search Monkey and social bookmarking service Delicious, which he described as “one of the last era’s most heartbreaking symbols of untapped potential in social media”.

Bing is exciting as an effective challenger to Google, but if that competition comes at the cost of cannibalising Yahoo’s innovative search work – then we won’t be so excited about Bing any more.

I also celebrate that I have a strategy to deal with this. What are the odds that two similar web services will disappear at the same time? Not good, I hope.

My web stuff paranoia has led me to set up another social bookmarking service called Diigo. So I have two active accounts on different social bookmarking services.

So does that mean I have to save everything I like twice? Well, sort of, but that’s because I’ve recently taken to using Evernote, a broader and more visual saving application. But back to strictly social bookmarking. I only save once.

How? you ask. In Diigo, under my account name, I go into “Tools” where I can “Import Bookmarks”, but more importantly, I can “Save Elsewhere”. I have added my del.icio.us account here, and every time I save to Diigo, I also save, without any extra work, to del.icio.us.

So I’m prepared! If Yahoo and Microsoft let del.icio.us die, I still have all my bookmarks in Diigo. (Same thing if something happened to Diigo.) And I have Evernote too!

Posted via web from joanvinallcox’s posterous

The Web is a Bottomless Toy Chest

I like to play on the web, and my biggest problem is my “I-can’t-catch-up” anxiety. There is always more to explore. And for free, either for the basic version or for a month. I can never try everything out. I can’t catch up. Ever.

I make things even more intense by following people who suggest really interesting web toys. Like Jane Hart, with her Jane’s E-Learning tip of the Day

If you teach or train, or just like to play on the web, you should check out her blog, and subscribe to it.Another of my current people to follow ’cause they give really neat toys – whoops, I mean URLs – away, is Steve Rubel – http://www.steverubel.com/ – Twice he mentioned Posterous. The first time, I tried it but left it orphaned. The second time, months, maybe years, later, I found my original account and started playing, even sort-of lifestreaming, copying him. Great fun.

His constant exploration and evolution is inspiring. Check him out, and subscribe to him in Posterous, and maybe to me too;-> As they say on tv, “Time well wasted!”

Posted via email from joanvinallcox’s posterous

Reading Content; Content Reading

All learning is contextual, in my opinion. You have to already know some aspect in order to learn more. I remember my Psych 101 prof, many, many years ago, saying that any book with more than 10% new content would be unreadable. So this video, found through krea_frobro747 on Twitter, appeals to me because it makes sense of my experience both as a reader and as a teacher of reading. Anyone concerned children learning to read, here’s foundational knowledge. (Might help mild dyslexics, too.)

In fact, when I roam the web trying to learn, I have problem trying to understand posts where I can’t bridge the gaps because I’m missing crucial knowledge. I guess the real take-away from this video is the more content you know, the more texts that are accessible to you, and the more you can teach yourself.

It’s like watching (or reading) the news. Initially it’s all disjointed and confusing. But watch and read long enough, and you pick up what you need to know to understand it. You see the patterns; you learn more faster. That’s why experience is valuable; your knowledge net is large and finely detailed.